3-Part Annotated Bibliography
Genesis Perez
Writing for the Social Science
April 19, 2025
3 part annotated bibliography 1
Citation:
Coleman-Minahan, K. (2022). Evaluating the impact of policies, disasters, and
racism on abortion access: A call for mandated and standardized public health
abortion surveillance. Health Affairs, 41(4), 623-631.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01791
Summary:
In this article, Coleman-Minahan looks at the different factors that affect abortion
access in the United States, focusing on laws, public health issues, and systemic
racism. The author points out that strict abortion laws, worsened by situations like
the COVID-19 pandemic, have especially harmed marginalized communities,
leading to significant gaps in access to reproductive health services.
Coleman-Minahan suggests that standardized public health tracking is needed to
better monitor abortion access and its outcomes, which could help improve future
policies and resource allocation.
Relevance:
This article is particularly useful in understanding the intersectionality of abortion
access, as it provides a comprehensive analysis of how various systemic factors
contribute to disparities in reproductive healthcare. The insights on public health
surveillance emphasize the importance of data collection and policy assessment in
addressing barriers to abortion access, making it relevant for researchers,
policymakers, and advocates focused on reproductive rights and health equity. This
article can serve as a foundational source for discussions on the need for
comprehensive abortion policies that consider the impact of race, socioeconomic
status, and health emergencies on access to reproductive services.
Using this Article:
I will utilize Coleman-Minahan’s findings to enrich my research on abortion
access, particularly in discussions about how combined societal factors affect
marginalized populations. The article’s call for improved public health surveillance
can support arguments advocating for data-driven policymaking in reproductive
health. Additionally, it can help frame a narrative around the necessity for
intersectional approaches in addressing healthcare disparities, particularly in the
context of abortion and reproductive rights. By citing this work, I aim to
underscore the importance of understanding the broader social determinants of
health in the ongoing conversations surrounding abortion access.
3-Part Annotated Bibliography 2
Citation:
Rooney, B., Krieger, N., & Rich-Edwards, J. (2000). Racism, poverty, abortion,
and other reproductive outcomes. Epidemiology, 11(6), 740-742.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200011000-00016
Summary:
In this commentary, Rooney, Krieger, and Rich-Edwards examine how racism and
poverty affect reproductive health, especially regarding abortion. The authors argue
that systemic racism and economic inequality have a significant impact on the
choices and health outcomes of marginalized groups. They present evidence
showing that these factors lead to higher rates of unintended pregnancies and
abortions among low-income women and women of color. The authors emphasize
the need for a better understanding of these issues in public health research and
policies, highlighting the importance of addressing the social conditions that
influence reproductive health outcomes.
Relevance:
This article is critical for examining how social factors like racism and poverty
contribute to disparities in reproductive health, including access to abortion. It
provides a comprehensive overview of the intersectional issues that affect women’s
reproductive choices and outcomes, making it a vital resource for discussions about
health equity in reproductive care. The insights offered by Rooney et al. can be
useful for framing arguments regarding the necessity of addressing underlying
social determinants in efforts to improve abortion access and overall reproductive
health outcomes.
Using this Article:
I intend to use Rooney, Krieger, and Rich-Edwards’ findings to bolster my research
on the systemic barriers that marginalized populations face regarding abortion
access. Their emphasis on the interconnectedness of racism and poverty will
support discussions on the broader implications of reproductive rights and health
equity. By referencing their arguments, I aim to highlight the need for policy
interventions that not only focus on legal access to abortion but also consider the
socioeconomic conditions that influence women’s reproductive choices. This
article will help underline the importance of a holistic approach in addressing
reproductive health disparities and advocating for comprehensive reproductive
health policies.
3-Part Annotated Bibliography 3
Citation:
Riley, T., Zia, Y., Samari, G., & Sharif, M. Z. (2022). Abortion criminalization: A
public health crisis rooted in white supremacy. American Journal of Public Health, 112(11), 1662-1667. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307624
Summary:
In this article, Riley, Zia, Samari, and Sharif argue that the criminalization of
abortion is not only a significant public health issue but also a manifestation of
systemic racism and white supremacy. The authors examine how laws that restrict
or criminalize abortion disproportionately affect marginalized communities,
particularly women of color and low-income individuals.They provide evidence
that these groups face higher health risks and more obstacles to getting safe
reproductive healthcare due to strict abortion laws. The article calls for a public
health approach to abortion that focuses on fairness and addresses the role of
racism in shaping reproductive health policies.
Relevance:
This article is crucial for understanding the intersection of abortion access, public
health, and systemic racism. It provides a compelling analysis of how abortion
criminalization exacerbates health disparities, offering a unique perspective that
links reproductive rights to broader social justice issues. The authors’ focus on the
detrimental effects of restrictive laws on marginalized populations highlights the
importance of advocacy for policies that support equitable access to reproductive
healthcare, making it relevant for discussions around health equity and
reproductive justice.
Using this Article:
I plan to incorporate the insights from Riley et al. to enhance my research on the
implications of abortion criminalization on public health, particularly for
marginalized populations. Their argument that racism and white supremacy are
underlying factors in abortion restrictions will support the narrative of how social
inequities shape reproductive health outcomes. By citing this article, I aim to
emphasize the necessity for a holistic approach to abortion policies that confront
systemic discrimination while advocating for health equity. This work will also
help underline the urgency of reevaluating current abortion laws in light of their
public health implications, promoting a shift toward more inclusive and supportive
reproductive health policies